Trial Counseling Program

Program Data Sheet
Spring 2013

Download PDF Version of the Data Sheet

Enrollment by Major and Campus

Major:	Degree	Term	Chuuk	Kosrae	National	Pohnpei	Yap	Students
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2011			27		8	35
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2012			19		5	24
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2013			15			15
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2011			14		12	26
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2012			28		8	36
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2013			23			23

Credits by Major and Campus

Major:	Degree	Term	Chuuk	Kosrae	National	Pohnpei	Yap	Credits
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2011			297		48	345
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2012			201		27	228
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2013			161			161
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2011			169		85	254
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2012			362		42	404
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2013			298			298

Credits by Program and Campus

Program	Term	Chuuk	Kosrae	National	Pohnpei	Yap	Credits
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2011			312	6	54	372
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2012			210		27	237
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2013			195	12		207
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2011			147		75	222
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2012			368		54	422
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2013			290			290

Credits Enrolled, Attempted and Earned(averages)

Major	Degree	Term	CredEnrollAvg	CredAttAvg	CredEarnAvg	TermGPAAvg
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2011	9.9	9.2	7.4	2.30
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2012	9.5	9.0	8.9	2.79
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2013	11.3	7.3	7.3	2.82
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2011	9.8	9.3	7.4	2.24
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2012	11.2	10.4	9.4	2.72
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2013	13.0	12.3	11.7	2.78

Program Sections, Enrollment Ratio and Average Class Size

Program	Term	Section	EnrollMax	Enrollment	EnrollRatio	AvgClassSize
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2011	8	172	116	67.4%	14.5
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2012	7	130	74	56.9%	10.6
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2013	4	80	68	85.0%	17.0
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2011	6	150	67	44.7%	11.2
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2012	8	165	12.4	75.2%	15.5
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2013	5	100	90	90.0%	18.0

Course Completion & Withdrawals (Major)

Major	Degree	Term	Students	ABCorP%	ABCDorP%	W%
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2011	76	89.5%	93.4%	5.3%
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2012	116	75.0%	81.9%	6.9%
Trial Counselor	CA	Fall 2013	39	87.2%	87.2%	7.7%
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2011	79	62.0%	81.0%	5.1%
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2012	125	78.4%	90.4%	7.2%
Trial Counselor	CA	Spring 2013	94	89.4%	90.4%	2.1%

Course Completion & Withdrawals (Program)

Program	Term	Students	ABCorP%	ABCDorP%	W%
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2011	125	76.0%	82.4%	6.4%
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2012	79	88.6%	92.4%	6.3%
Trial Counselor (CA)	Fall 2013	51	96.1%	96.1%	0.0%
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2011	70	58.6%	78.6%	4.3%
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2012	131	80.9%	92.4%	6.1%
Trial Counselor (CA)	Spring 2013	91	89.0%	91.2%	1.1%

Graduates

Major	Degree	AY2010/11	AY2011/12	AY2012/13
Trial Counselor	CA	10	13	13

• Data based on SIS extracts December 2013 expect for graduates information.
• Program" information is based on Dickerson's concept of a "program" as expending resoruces and is linked to courses owned by a program from TracDat
• Graduation rates are based on Fall new students(full time) cohorts that are tracked at 100%, 150%, and 200%
• Retention rates are based on Fall new students (full time) cohorts who return the following fall semester
• Persistence rates are based on Fall new students (full time) cohorts who return the following spring semester

Program Review (Yap Campus)

AP Full Official:Certificate of Achievement in Trial Counselors-YC

Campus: Yap Campus

Completed by: Joy Guarin

AP Review Submission Date:March 31, 2014

AR Review Cycle: 2012-2013

1. Program Goals

   At the completion of Secretarial Certificate the student will be able to::
   

   1. Have a working knowledge of the major techniques of legal research and writing.
   2. Describe how the FSM and state rules of criminal interpreted and applied.
   3. Describe the law of torts and basic principles of admiralty law.
   4. Understand the concept of dispute resolution techniques including, but not limited to, mediation, arbitration, and community resolution procedures.
   5. Understand the law of contracts and general business law.
   6. Describe the processes of comprehensive examination of problems of proof and the rules of evidence.
   7. Understand the constitution of the FSM, its states and municipalities.
   8. Describe the FSM and State rules of the appellate and civil procedure.
   9. Describe and explain the FSM and State real property laws.
   10. Practice actual supervised pre-trial and trial skills in civil and criminal cases.

2. Program History

   In 1996,Certificate of achievement program for trial counselors is approved for implementation pending availability of funding. The program started with 1 student in fall of 2010 at Yap campus.

3. Program Descriptions

   This certificate program provides training opportunities for current as well as aspiring and upcoming trial counselors to improve their skills and competency and to prepare them to be effective decision makers in their respective courts, It also provides for networking and sharing among trial counselors.

4. Program Admission Requirements

   High School graduates and General Educational Development (GED) certificate holders who are not accepted into or are not interested in a degree program may apply for admission into an entry level certificate of achievement program.

   Applicants with significantly low scores are ineligible for admission. Other certificates of achievement program are offered when criteria for offering the program are met. Admissions requirements vary with the program. Application forms are available at Yap campus.

5. Program Certificate/Degree Requirements

   The following are the major requirements:
   Program Requirements

           Major Requirements:....................31 credits

   Law 200 Legal Research and Writing (3)
   Law 210 Criminal Procedure (3)
   Law 215 Criminal Law (3)
   Law 220 Torts (3)
   Law 224 Contracts (3)
   Law 228Evidence (3)
   Law 232 Constitutional Law (3)
   Law 236 Appellate and Civil Procedure/Jurisdiction (4)
   Law 238 Real Property (3)
   Law 240 Trial Practice Internship (3)

6. Program Courses and Enrollment

   Program Enrollment

   Spring 2011	Fall 2011	Spring 2012	Fall 2012	Spring 2013	Fall 2013	Total
   12/td>	8	8	5	0	0	33

   
   

   Spring 2012	Fall 2012	Spring 2013	Fall 2013	Total
   8	5	0	0	13

   
   Number of Sections, Course enrollment

   Courses Number	Number of section	Course Enrollment	Semester
   Law 210	1	9	Spring 2012
   Law< 232/td>	1	9	Spring 2012
   Law 228	1	5	Fall 2012
   Law 240	1	4	2012




7. Program Faculty

   Name of Faculty	FullTime/Parttime	Degrees Held	Rank
   Jeremiah Luther	Part time	Doctor of Jurisprudence	Instructor
   Matthew Mannisto	Part time	JD. Litigation	Instructor
   JD. Litigation	Part time	BA, JD,LLM	Instructor	Major courses

   
   Faculty student ratio for the program For 2012-2013

   Name of Faculty	Number of Students	Faculty Student Ratio
   3	13	1:4

8. Program Indicators

   1. Assessment of course student learning outcomes of program courses

   Table 1.Fall 2012

   Course No.	Instructor Name	No. of Students Enrolled	No. of stu-dents with "W"	No. of Students Successful of SLO 1	SLO 2	SLO 3	SLO 4	SLO 5	SLO 6
   Law 228	Douglas Jennings	5	0	5	5	5	5	5
   Law 240	Jeremiah Luther	4	0	4

   Note: Used the old course outline using general objectives:

   
   

   2.Assessment of program student learning outcomes

   PSLO Assessment Report Summary (PAS of Trial Counselors Program, 2012-2013)

   What we looked at:
   The Trial Counseling certificate, assessment focused on PSLOs 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, and 10. Listed below are the results for each of the PSLOs.

   What we found:
   

   • PSLO #1: This PLO was assessed Fall 2012, using the Legal research class. Assessment as identified under strategies and the overall performance was at 90%.
   • PSLO #2: The PLO was assessed in Fall 2012, using Law 215 or Criminal law and the pass rate, based on assessment strategies resulted in a 83% pass rate.
   • PSLO #6: The outcome was assessed using Law 228 or Evidence during Spring 2013. A total of 15 students enrolled and 14 (93%) students completed and passed the course.
   • PLSO #7: This outcome was assessed during Spring of 2013, using course (Law 232) Constitutional Law. The assessed using tools identified under assessment strategies. A total of 19 students enrolled and 17 students completed and passed the course.
   • PSLO #9: The outcome was assessed in Spring 2013, using (Law 238) Real Property. A total of 20 students enrolled in the course and they were assessed, using the tools indicated as assessment strategies. Out the 20m students, 18 students passed and completed the course.
   • PSLO #10: Summer 2012-Nine (9) students enrolled and 7 students completed the course with a 78% pass rate. Summer 2013-Fourteen (14) students enrolled and all completed the course at a 100% pass rate. Students were assessed for both Summers 2012 and 2013. Results indicated about 75% passing rate. The target is met but has the lowest passing rate compared to the other outcomes.

   What we are planning to work on:
   

   recommendation by the instructor is to have two semesters of legal research class instead of one, prior to taking this course. An additional recommendation is to purchase a package through CALL.org, a computer-assistant learning program used by nearly every law school in the United States. The package costs around $250.00/year.

   • The course currently does not have a textbook. There is no recommendation for a textbook at the moment. Part of the reason why no recommendation has been made can be attributed to the fact that the course is taught by a different instructor every semester. Thus, there has not been any consensus to a specific textbook. a recommendation can be made to address the need for a regular law instructor who can also serve as the coordinator for the program.
   • Offer the course during a regular semester or have students take only one course, which is this course.

   Recommendations for students:
   

   • Students planning to enroll into the program can follow the proposed schedule of courses (per College catalog) to begin taking introductory law courses.
   • Students planning to get into the course are recommended to have good research and writing, analytical and critical thinking skills.
   • Recommended for in service legal staff or someone interested in the legal field.

   3.Program enrollment (historical enrollment patterns, student credits by major)

   Table 1. Enrollment patterns by major

   Term	No.of Enrolled Students(Yap)	Overall number of students enrolled (Chuuk,Pohnpei and Yap)	Percentage(%)
   Spring 2011	12	26	46.2%
   Fall 2011	8	35	23%
   Spring 2012	8	36	22.2%
   Fall 2012	5	24	20.8%
   Spring 2013	0	15	0%
   Fall 2013	0	23	%

   
   Table 2 Credits by major

   Term	No.of Enrolled Students(Yap)	Total enrollment of YAP campus	Percentage(%)
   Spring 2011	75	222	34%
   Fall 2011	54	372	15%
   Spring 2012	54	422	13%
   Fall 2012	27	237	11%
   Spring 2013	0	290	0%
   Fall 2013	0	207	0%
   Total	210

   
   

   4.Average Class Size

   Table 1 Average class size

   Term	Section	Enroll/Max	Enrollment	EnrollRatio(3/2)	AvgClassSize(3/1)
   Spring 2012	2	40	18	45%	9
   Fall 2012	2	40	9	22.5%	5
   Spring 2013
   Fall 2013
   Average					7

   
   

   5.Course completion rate

   Table 1. Spring 2012 Completion Rate per Course

   Course No.	Instructor Name	No.of Students Enrolled	No.of Students with "W"	Number of Students with a grade of F	Number of students completed the course	Completion rate(6/3)
   Law 210	Jeremiah Luther	9	0	1	8	89%
   Law 232	Matthew Mannisto	9	0	0	9	100%
   Total Average Rate		18	0	1	17	94.5%

   
   Table 2. Fall 2012 Completion Rate per Course

   Course No.	Instructor Name	No.of Students Enrolled	No.of Students with "W"	Number of Students with a grade of F	Number of students completed the course	Completion rate(6/3)
   Law 228							Douglas Jennings							5							0							0							5							100%
   Law 240							Jeremiah Luther							4							0							0							4							100%
   Total/Average Rate														9							0							0							9							100%

   Rate of students with W- 3.7%; Rate of students with a grade of F- 0%; General completion rate- 97.25%

   
   

   6. Student persistence rate (semester to semester)

   Persistence rate is based on Fall new students (full time) cohorts who return the following spring semester.

   Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2012	Same students, Spring 2013	Persistence Rate(%)
   None

   
   

   7. Student retention rate (Fall-to-Fall for two-year programs; Fall-to-Spring for one-year programs)

   Retention rate is based on Fall new students (full time) cohorts who return the following the spring semester

   Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2012	Same students, Fall 2013	Retention Rate(%)
   None

   
   

   8. Success rates on licensing or certification exams (CTE, TP, Nursing, etc)

   N/A

   9. Graduation rate based on yearly number

   Term	Number of Graduates
   Spring 2012	0
   Fall 2012	5
   Spring 2013	0
   Fall 2013	0
   Total	5

   
   

   10.Students seat cost

   At the present tuition rate of $105 per credit the total seat cost per student completing this program is $3,255 The table below shows detailed information.

   Classes	Credits	CPC	CPS
   Law 200	3	$105	$315
   Law 210	3	$105	$315
   Law 215	3	$105	$315
   Law 220	3	$105	$315
   Law 224	3	$105	$315
   Law 228	3	$105	$315
   Law 232	3	$105	$315
   Law 236	4	$105	$420
   Law 238	3	$105	$315
   Law 240	3	$105	$315
   Total	34		$3,255/b>

   CPC- Cost Per Credit; CPS- Cost Per Student

   11. Cost of duplicate or redundant courses, programs or services

   None

   12. Students' satisfaction rate

   A survey was conducted on selected behaviors of instructors for each class at the end of every semester. There were 15 items in the survey and students were asked to rate each class according to these items on a scale of 1 to 5; 1 being never , 2 is rarely, 3 as sometimes, 4 is usually and 5 being always.
   
   The following are the items used in the survey
   1-Keeps regular schedule every class day. 2-Shows interest in the subject. 3-Gives individual help as needed 4-Avails self for student conference.5- Welcomes questions, suggestions, and discussions from students 6- Shows interest and respect for students.7- Helps the students in meeting individual learning needs.8- Uses classroom/lab time fully 9-Provides clear directions for assignments and instruction. 10-Grades fairly.11- Makes the purpose of the course clear. 12-Talks clearly and at an easy-to-follow speed.13- Paces the lessons well with activity as well as lecture. 14 Makes the course interesting.15- Textbook was appropriate and helpful. Students' Satisfaction Survey Results(Weighted Means) Legend:
   
   N-Number of students; AWM Average Weighted Mean; D-Descriptive Equivalent; U-Usually; A-Always

   The table below shows detailed information on the students’ satisfaction survey during Fall 2012.

   Spring 2013

   Courses	N	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	AWM	D
   Law 228	5	4.8	4.6	4.7	4.7	4.8	4.8	4.6	4.6	4.6	4.7	4.4	4.4	4.5	4.9		4.7	A
   Law 240	4	4	4.3	4.8	4.3	4.3	3.5	3.8	4	4.3	4	4.3	4.3	4.5	4.5		4.2	A

   General Weighted Mean 4.45
   Descriptive Equivalent Always

   
   

   13. Alumni data

   1 graduate at National Campus from Yap.

   14. Employment data and employer feedback (employer survey)

   Graduate Number	Working?	Locaiton	In School?	Locaiton
   1	Yes	AYUW Comm.	No
   2	No		Yes	BA, FIji
   3	No		Yes	USP, Law Fiji
   4	Yes	COM-FSM	No
   5	Yes	Yap Social Security	No

   
   

   15.Program added or cancelled at nearby regional institutions (PCC, GCC, Hawaii schools, UOG, CMI, NMC)

   N/A

   16. Transfer Rate

   None

9. Analysis and Recommendation

   Finding
   This section provides discussion of information discovered as a result of the evaluation such as problems or concerns with the program and what part of the program is working well and meeting expectation.

   1. No enrollment during Spring 2013 and Fall 2013. This affected persistence rate and the retention rate of the program.
   2. Faculty student ratio is 1:4.
   3. Course Level Assessment was completed using the old course outline.
   4. Major courses offered each semester is 1 section.
   5. Average class size is 7.
   6. Rate of students with W- 3.7%; Rate of students with a grade of F- 0%; General completion rate- 97.25%.
   7. During Fall 2012, Instructors were rated “Always” in the Students Evaluation of Teachers Behaviors.
   8. Graduates are produced only in Fall 2012. Two of the graduates during Fall 2012 pursued degree courses related to Law in Fiji.

   Recommendation:

   This section provides recommendations from the program on what to do to improve or enhance the quality of program and course learning outcomes as well as program goals and objectives. This section should also include suggestions that describe how the program might be able to create opportunities for a better program in the future. Some examples are exploring alternate delivery mechanisms, forming external partnerships, or realigning with other programs.

   1. Increase enrollment by developing recruitment strategies.
   2. All faculty should complete course level assessment every semester.
   3. Course outline should be written in the new format.
   4. Improve data collection and management.

Unit Assessment Report

Report Period: 2013-2014