Accreditation Liaison Materials

ComputingDirectoryHomeJobsLibraryNews

AdmissionsArticulationCabinetChairsCurriculumPersonnelSelf StudyStudent Services

Accreditation Liaison Officer materials

ACCJC Annual Report 2004 - 2005
ACCJC Annual Report 2004 - 2005 Distance Learning Update
ACCJC Annual Report 2003 - 2004
ACCJC Annual Report 2003 - 2004 Distance Learning Update
COMFSM Annual Reportsxw
Role of the Accreditation Liaison Officer
ALO Budget 154 FY 2005sxc
ALO May report to Board of Regents
COM-FSM pots on the stove 2004: projectssxc

AAS Pohnpei campus visit images

Progress Report Spring 2005

Progress report draft 15 March 2005
Visiting team April 2005

To the extent possible, the Microsoft Word documents have been scanned for viruses. This does not absolve the user of this page from having up to date anti-virus software on their computer. Links labeled sxw and sxc are OpenOffice.org 1.1 files.

Self Study 2003

Visit calendar
Sunday evening working dinner guest list
Key interviews
Visit team descriptions
Exit assembly report
Unofficial exit summary
Options
early draft visit report
Images

Self Study Final Draft (1.92 MB PDF) Posted 27 Jan 2004

Standards Work

College of Micronesia-FSM Publications Manual of Style

Draft 2003

Editor: Jonathan Gourlay
Administration Liaison: Spensin James
Administrative Assistant: Dayle Dannis
Documentation Support: Norma Edwin

  1. Cover PageCover Sheet
  2. Table of Contents
  3. IntroductionDana Lee Ling
    1. Institutional History
    2. Demographic information: area served, enrollment, student and staff diversity. Projections and trends.
    3. Response to prior recommendations.
      1. Policies: The visiting team recommends that COM-FSM immediately identify, collect, and disseminate all policies and procedures which includes all general campus operations. Existing Board of Regents and administrative policies are to be put in writing and disseminated to all members of the campus community, including the state campuses.
      2. Communication and Distributed Authority: The visiting team recommends that the staff at the National Campus make every effort to improve communications, regularly seek advice and opinion from the state campus staff relating to decisions directly affecting them; i.e., fiscal reports, the granting of more local authority on fiscal decision, improvement of the purchasing process.
      3. Strategic plan and Audit Compliance: The visiting team recommends that COM-FSM make a concerted effort to finish the strategic plan and the current long range planning and evaluation document We Make a Difference as soon as possible. As a part of this process, the COM-FSM should take the necessary steps to eliminate audit compliance issues necessary to protect the resources of the institution and to meet the requirements of the granting agencies.
      4. Formalize Research and Finalize Technology Plan: The visiting team recommends that COM-FSM formalize its institutional research process utilizing surveys and other research methods to measure student outcomes, assess institutional effectiveness, and deliver quality instruction and student support services. In addition, institutional research should be used to finalize a technology plan and assist in the acquisition of equipment to support instructional and student services programs.
      5. Learning Resources: The visiting team recommends that COM-FSM act as a system to share library resources among the National and state campuses. This would include placing a high priority on addressing the facility needs at the state campuses and exploring the feasibility of using telecommunications technologies more effectively among all campus library resources.
      6. State Campus Faculty: The visiting team recommends that COM-FSM place a high priority on filling full-time faculty positions at all state campuses. Positions in English and Computer Sciences are especially sensitive and critical as building blocks for the state campus educational programs.
      7. Personnel Manual: The visiting team recommends that COM-FSM immediately update the existing personnel manual and include it in the institution-wide policy and procedures manual. The manual should ensure that the new employee improvement plan is complete and that the evaluation instrument used have as its primary focus the improvement of job performance based on work-related criteria.
      8. Dormitory and Recreation: The visiting team recommends that the National Campus give immediate attention to the management of the dormitory facilities. A program which increases students' sensitivity to a more appropriate study, as well as social, environment, should be put into place as soon as possible. It is further recommended that an immediate priority be given to making available existing facilities for student recreation use, until such time as recreational facilities can be constructed.
      9. Grounds and Maintenance: The visiting team recommends that COM-FSM address the grounds/maintenance staffing needs necessary to care for and improve the condition of the new facility at Palikir and particularly at the state campuses.
    4. Longitudinal student achievement data, including course completion[,] transfer rates, number of degrees and certificated awarded, job placement, licensure, persistence rates, retention rates, graduation rates, basic skills completion, success after transfer, etc.
    5. Student learning outcomes evidence gathered to date.
  4. Abstract of the report: summative assessment of how well the institution is meeting the standards as a whole. It should be based on the themes that pervade the standards: institutional commitments, evaluation, planning, and improvement, student learning outcomes, organization, dialogue, and institutional integrity.
  5. Organization for the Self Study. In narrative or chart form, show the organization established to conduct the self-study.
  6. Organization for the institution. See manual for extended details.
  7. Certification of compliance with 21 Eligibility Requirements. • Board of Regents
  8. Institutional Self-Evaluation Using Commission Standards
    1. Institutional Mission and Effectiveness 04 Nov 03Word format 24 Nov 0330 October 03
      1. Mission 20 Sep 03 25 Aug 03 04 Jan 03 • Patricia Kelly
      2. Improving Institutional Effectiveness 29 Sep 03 05 Jan 03Dana Lee Ling
    2. Student Learning Programs and Services
      1. Instructional Programs 24 Nov 03IIA Evidence • Mariana Ben-Dereas, Susan Moses
      2. Student Support Services 24 Nov 03IIB summary • Eddie Haleyalig, Arlene Dumantay, Jenise Nicholson
      3. Library and Learning Support Services 25 Nov 03 • Jean Thoulag
    3. Resources 01 Oct 03 • Howard Rice
      1. Human Resources 24 Nov 03 • Faustino Yarofaisug, Linda Maradol
      2. Physical Resources 24 Nov 03 • Jeff Steel
      3. Technology Resources 24 Nov 03 • Gregg Longanecker, Jeff Steel
      4. Financial Resources 24 Nov 03 • Charles Musana-Manyindo
    4. Governance 24 Nov 03 • Dale Griffith • IVA3, 4, 5
    5. Senior Standards 24 Nov 03 • Richard Womack
  9. A list of evidence available in the team room

Meetings

Thursday 14 August 2003: Triad description (sxc)
Honolulu ACCJC September 2003

Memos

Recommmended action items post-visit March 2004
Six themes (doc)
ALO Report for Board of Regents Meeting 06 October 2003
IB3 IE Institutional Effectiveness/Assessment committee study
21 Eligibility requirements with check boxes
21 Eligibility requirements without check boxes

Self-Study Questions

Standard I Mission Questions (sxw)
Standard IIA questionnaire (doc) (sxc)
Standard IIB Student Support Services (doc) (html)

Surveys

Demographicssxc
Dormitory emailsxcxls
Recreation
IA Mission sxc
IIB Recreation
IIIC Tech Plan Analysis (xls).sxccommentary
IV Opinions (xls)
IV Comments

Extant documents

Eligibility

Joint Process Chart
Eligibility Draft Final Version 04 July 2003
Eligibility Study for WASC Senior Commission
Cross Index Cover Page
Cross Reference on Standards between ACCJC and ACSCU
Cross Walk Index (WSC) ERSCS
Cross Index SC-ERR
Cross-Walk Index
Document Portfolio Title Page
Portfolio Index

Faculty Handbook

Faculty Handbook Cover
Faculty Handbook (PDF)

Substantive Changes

Bachelor of Education
Body

Cover Page
Title Page
Substantive Change Report B.Ed Draft Six 28 Nov 2002
The Standards and How we Meet Them

Response

Non-acceptance by ACCJC

Annexes

82101CurriComMinutes.doc
Annex F Integrated Competencies
Annex G Teacher Outcome Inventory

Response to Substantive

Response
AppendicesABCDEFGH

Accreditation

4 Standards Draft C (Word).doc

1997 Self Study
1998 ACCJC Evaluation Report
1998 Evaluation Follow Through Chart.doc

2000 Accreditation Midterm Report
2001 ACCJC Evaluation Report

ACCJC Accreditation New Standards (June 2002).RTF
ACCJC Annual Report 2002-2003.doc
College Organizational Chart 1.doc
General Education Statement Revision Resources (Dec. 2002).doc

Admissions

Articulation

Articulation agreements in place

Chairs

Four Points

Curriculum

Chuuk campus director comments on cap
Projects on a Ganttsxc

Personnel

Code of Ethicsdoc

Proposed code of ethics
Proposed faculty evaluation

Lee LingCollege of Micronesia-FSM


The content accessed from this page does not necessarily reflect the official position of either the College of Micronesia-FSM nor the Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics. The information contained in this page is supplied without warranty, implied or otherwise. Information on this page should not be used in life support equipment, nuclear control systems, nor should this information be eaten for breakfast.