COMET Admissions Examination Statistical Summaries Spring 2009


19 May 2009 Notes:


In this statistical summary those who took the College of Micronesia-FSM Entrance Test (COMET) are referred to interchangeably as "students" and "candidates." There is no distinction intended by these two terms.


As of 11 May 2009 Mortlocks high school, Neighboring Islands Central High School on Woleai, and Weipat high school had yet to sit the COMET.


On 19 May some tables and charts were update to include section break-out data for NMHS and PICS. This author thanks those at these two schools for sharing their class lists. Two new appendices have been added with essay and math sum means data by high school. Not all paragraph text was updated to reflect this new data.


Basic Statistics


The COMET admissions examination consisted of four main sections. The four main sections included an essay, vocabulary, comprehension, and a math section consisting of four subsections. The basic statistics for these sections and subsections are presented in the table one below.


2009

Essay

Voc

Comp

95

96

99

100

msum

z-score

COMET

count

1713

1710

1710

1715

1715

1715

1713

1721

1721

1721

min

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-12.27

24.57

max

50

42

46

10

10

10

10

39

16.4

1264.3

range

50

42

46

10

10

10

10

39

28.67

1239.73

midrange

25

21

23

5

5

5

5

19.5

2.06

644.44

mode

0

11

16

9

7

2

2

18

-2.72

437.58

median

24

11

18

7

6

3

3

19

-0.19

546.86

mean

23.21

12.74

19.09

6.97

5.73

3.53

2.98

19.14

-0.06

552.76

stdev

11.99

6.25

7.41

2.19

2.51

2.11

1.88

7.07

5.1

220.6

cv

0.52

0.49

0.39

0.31

0.44

0.6

0.63

0.37

-90.34

0.4

Table 1: Basic statistics

Essay is the essay score out of 50.

Voc is the vocabulary score out of 45.

Comp is comprehension out of 48.

95 is the first math subsection and contains ten arithmetic level problems.

96 is the second math subsection and contains ten prealgebra level problems.

99 is the third math subsection and contains ten elementary algebra problems.

100 is the fourth math subsection and contains ten college level algebra problems.

msum is the sum of the math subsections and is out of forty.


Correlations


The math test was rewritten in 2009. The overall number of math problems performed correctlyremains, given the sample size, correlated moderately to the essay, vocabulary, and comprehension sections of the examination.


Correlations

Essay

Voc

Comp

Math sum

Essay

1

0.53

0.62

0.52

Vocabulary

0.53

1

0.72

0.46

Comprehension

0.62

0.72

1

0.59

Math sum

0.52

0.46

0.59

1


The moderate correlation for mathematics indicates that mathematics is linked to language skills, at the same time the mathematics score provides independent information on the abilities of the candidate. Thus the mathematics score is valuable for a more comprehensive picture of the skills the candidate possesses.


The question is often asked, would student "x" have been admitted if their math score was stronger. In other words, does the math section keep students from attaining associates degree admission. The above correlations should provide statistical assurance that the math section alone did not "sink" a student – the essay was the strongest driver of the rank order. In addition, there is a correlation between math and English, so a really weak math score for a given set of language scores may suggest the student is weaker than the language test results indicate. Again, the mathematics score is important to providing a broader picture of the student's academic abilities.

Distributions


The distribution of scores on each section is given in illustration one. The score is on the horizontal axis, the vertical axis is the number of students with that score.



Illustration 1: Frequency distribution for the COMET subtests



With the exception of the essay section, the other sections distributed in a manner which is considered statistically reasonable. That is, the frequency (the number of students) rises with the score towards the mean, and then falls as the score continues to rise past the mean to the maximum possible score. If the distribution (the shape of the curve) is a symmetrical heap, the most common score is also the mean score as well as the median score. This distribution is sometimes called a "bell curve" and is mathematically described by the normal or student's t-distribution.


In the past, the writing section, the essay, has in performed in a statistically reasonable fashion except for the number of students who score a sum of zero. This was true again this year with 85 scores of zero. In the spring of 2006 there were 235 scores of zero for 1783 candidates (13%). In the spring of 2007 there were 144 scores of zero for 1608 candidates (9%). Spring 2008 there were 163 scores of zero for 1815 candidates (9%). The spring 2008 data increased to 9% from 8.1% when data came in from Mortlocks and Weipat High Schools. Original versions of the COMET report suggested a fall in the number of zeros, this was contradicted by late arriving data.


Spring 2009 the scoring rubric was altered in the way scores of zero are generated. In the past an off-topic paper was awarded a zero. This year the essay readers were instructed to mark off-topic papers for grammar and vocabulary, which greatly reduced the number of essays scoring a zero to 85 out of 1713 (5.0%).


In the spring of 2006, the most common score on the essay, except for zero, was the then maximum possible score of 40. There was anecdotal evidence that the rubric needed to be adjusted as papers that varied in quality were "maxing out" at 40. A change in the rubric permitted a maximum score of 50 in 2007. In both 2007 and the current run of the test, the right tail of the essay distribution now falls steadily from the mean to the maximum possible. With the adjustment in the maximum possible in 2006, the essay continued to behave in a statistically reasonable manner.


Spring 2009 a "fat tail" at 50 reappeared with sixteen near perfect essays. This is not presently a statistical concern as the number remains small. There is a little room for further adjustments in the rubric and no driving need for differentiating these students: these students are writing very capable essays.


Graders did raise questions on whether individual essay prompts behaved in a statistically equivalent manner. The lack of machine coding of the essay prompts and scores precluded analyzing the performance of individual prompts.



Year-to-Year Mean Scores by Section


The following table provides the mean score by entrance test subsection. Note that use of the reading section was discontinued in 2006. The grammar section was discontinued in 2007. A vocabulary and comprehension section based on the Gates-MacGinitie Level AR reading tests was added in 2008. The essay section was worth only 40 points in 2006, in 2007, 2008, and 2009 the essay section was worth 50 points. Spring 2009 the mathematics section of the COMET was completely rewritten.


Section

2006

Section

2007

Section

2008

2009

Reading

14.81






Grammar

37.04

Grammar

34.87




Essay (40)

20.69

Essay (50)

22.03

Essay (50)

23.87

23.21





Vocabulary

12.23

12.74





Comprehension

18.33

19.09

Math subsect one

6.69


6.63


6.83

6.97

Math subsect two

3.69


4.04


4.60

5.73

Math subsect three

3.51


3.40


3.60

3.53

Math subsect four

2.43


2.49


2.55

2.98

Math sum

16.21


16.44


17.50

19.14

Table 2: Year-to-year averages

The college might consider broadening the content scope of the COMET to provide an impetus for schools to improve in areas beyond English and Mathematics. The natural and social sciences are areas that might be explored for content oriented sections of the COMET.


Rank order and Program Placement


The admissions board approved a rank-order formula using z-scores. In spring 2008 the formula placed a 50% weight on the essay, 16.7% weight on vocabulary, 16.7% weight on comprehension, and a 16.7% weight on mathematics. The individual weighted z-scores were added to generate a sum of z-scores. The resulting z-score was linearly transformed to produced the final COMET score.


A COMET score of 700 was approved as the cut-off for admission to an associate degree program. A COMET score of 300 was established as the minimum score for admission to a certificate program. Students who have scored between 300 and 700 will be eligible to enroll in a certificate program.


Bear in mind that the college now operates based on fixed resources and specific projections of the number students that the college can serve. Each site has an target enrollment number and an maximum enrollment capacity limit. Like many smaller colleges, the college opts to admit a specific number of students.


The result is that the target associate admissions number is a fixed number. Put another way, there is not the possibility at present of all high schools increasing the number of students attaining associates admission to the college. If one high school sees an increase in the number of students who have attained associates admission, then some other high school (or high schools) must have seen a decrease in the number of students who gained associates admission. Thus admission is competitive and is mathematically termed a zero-sum game.


High schools that are using increases in associates admissions as an indicator do so at their own peril. If another high school improves by a larger amount, then that first high school could see a drop in admissions despite real improvement in their own educational processes. The college does not recommend using the entrance test as an performance indicator. The entrance test is designed solely for the internal admissions purposes of the college. That said, schools that still choose to use the entrance test as a performance measure should look at improving average performance by section. This data is reported later in this report.


The next table records the distribution by state and high school of the students into the three categories delineated above.


School

Sect

Non-admitted

Certificate

Associates

Total

Berea


6

11

7

24

CCA




10

10

CHS


50

71

7

128

CSC


20

80

2

102

CSDA


1

15

10

26

Faichuk


30

5


35

KHS

not specified

1

48

13

62

KHS

advanced



24

24

KHS

academic


10

11

21

KSC



3

1

4

MHS


7

75

8

90

Mizpah


2

20


22

NMHS

undetermined


1


1

NMHS

a1


9

12

21

NMHS

a2


8

12

20

NMHS

b


11

2

13

NMHS

v1


16

4

20

NMHS

v2

1

29

1

31

Ohwa



6

3

9

OIHS


3

30

1

34

OLMS



6


6

PICS

undetermined


22

3

25

PICS

a1


3

29

32

PICS

a2

1

11

20

32

PICS

a3


14

16

30

PICS

a4


22

8

30

PICS

a5


21

10

31

PICS

a6

1

19

4

24

PICS

b

2

66

14

82

PICS

v

5

24

2

31

PLHA


5

19

2

26

PSC


17

150

23

190

PSDA



9

31

40

Saramen


2

35

7

44

SNHSF


32

12


44

SNHST


19

15

1

35

Weno


29

39

2

70

Xavier




31

31

YHS


9

79

58

146

YSC


3

49

17

69

YSC


1



1

YSDA



1

4

5

Overall


247

1064

410

1721


In recognition that the different high school programs may have different individual goals for their students, this section level data is broken out above. The college thanks the high schools and administrators who have provided this information. Better information from the high schools allows the college to provide more accurate feed back to those schools.


Note that the table above reports the high school name using the names provided to this author by those working on behalf of the admissions board.


The average COMET score seen in table four represents a measure of the relative performance across all sections as weighted by the z-score. High school names are as in the original data, refer to table three above for clarification.


School

COMET

CCA

1066

Xavier

1034.37

KHS advanced

887.62

PSDA

856.73

YSDA

777.03

KHS a2

678.35

CSDA

654.71

YHS

642.02

Nanpei Memorial HS

629.57

PICS

622.57

Ohwa

616.46

KHS non-a

602.49

KSC

602.06

YSC

587.26

Our Lady of Mercy

577.04

Saramen

561.27

Overall average

552.76

PSC

532.69

Madolehnihmw HS

525.81

Berea

522.87

Mizpah

482.49

Pentecostal Lighthouse

479.47

OIHS

452.43

CSC

408.59

CHS

380.84

Weno

364.52

SNHST

306.84

SNHS Fefan

279.68

Faichuuk

210.01

Table 3: Average COMET score by high school


A COMET mean below 400 is exceptionally weak and below 300 represents essentially random performance on all included subsections. Two high schools had an average COMET score below certificate admission level. This should be looked upon as an opportunity for improvement.


Bearing in mind that admissions is zero sum, it is not possible for all schools to score above 700. That said, schools or sections with averages above 700 deserve a "well done" for their strong performances.


While the individual high school scores are of interest to individual schools, state educational leadership might consider the mean performance of all of the schools in their state.


Where a performance is strong, no one effort can be credited with the success. Where a performance is weak, no one lack can be faulted as the cause of the poor performance. Education is a set of canoes with many people paddling. Students, parents, teachers, administrators, state leadership, and special programs should all share in the credit where credit is due, in the blame where performances are weak.


Essay section


The writing section is considered by both the language and literature division and by those from other divisions who mark this section to possibly be singularly indicative of the capacity of students to academically succeed at the college – if there is such a thing as a single indicator. The maximum possible score is a fifty. Scores of twenty and under are considered to be significantly weak and raise questions as to whether these students can tackle any program that requires the ability to communicate in written English.


Determining whether one high school is statistically significantly stronger in essay rank order than another high school requires determining whether the mean essays scores are sufficiently separated.


In illustration 2, the vertical bars show the extent of the 95% confidence interval for the mean essay score. Where a bar for one school overlaps the mean for another school, the former is not statistically separated from the mean of the later. The mean is marked by the horizontal line at the midpoint of the vertical bar.


The vertical axis in illustration two is the essay score, the high schools are listed in descending rank order.




The mean essay scores suggest that Kosrae, Pohnpei, and Yap states are, to differing degrees, accomplishing the task of instructing students in the skills necessary to compose written English essays.


Yap High School is apparently unique. As far as th is author knows, the students are not "streamed" into academic, business, nor vocational programs. In rank order Yap High School tops the list of public high schools in performance on the essay test. Yap High School is clearly doing good things in English essay skills and is doing them with "every child."


PICS, Kosrae High School, and Nanpei Memorial round out the public high schools with an overall average above the national average. Madolehnihmw High School (MHS) performed below the national average on the essay section. With this section weighing in at 50% of the COMET score, this is an area worth focusing upon in terms of COMET success. Essay writing is also an intrinsically valuable skill.


Looking at the individual public high schools in Chuuk indicates an almost complete lack of ability to accomplish a written composition in the English language.


An average of 20 is the equivalent result of two essay readers rating the essay as being two in all categories. Averages below 10 would be the result of being awarded a one in all categories. Below 10, the essay has errors of grammar that are so severe as to make comprehension virtually impossible, the vocabulary is limited and misused, and the answer bears little relation to the task set by the essay question. The rubric is included at the end of this report.


While some fields such as science have significant support costs, English language and literature is likely the least expensive program on a per student basis. This is not likely a failure due to a lack of funding alone.


In spring 2008 the COMET report noted that the weaker performance of each newer high school in Chuuk casts doubt on the wisdom of splitting out the high school students from Weno back to their home islands in the lagoon. Each newer lagoon high school is weaker than the original high school from which the students had been split out. This is in contrast to Pohnpei where the new high schools perform on par with or better than the original "parent" high school. This note continues to hold true in 2009. There is no sign of change or improvement.


Changes in essay performance 2007, 2008, and 2009


The essays were marked against the same rubric in 2007 and 2008. In 2009 the scoring of off-topic essays was altered. In the past off-topic essays were scored a zero in all categories. In 2009 off-topic essays that were not obviously "canned" (memorized) essays were scored for syntax, vocabulary, organization, and cohesion. This would have the effect of lifting the average of any high school which had a significant number of scores of zero on the essay. The table is in roughly alphabetic order by high school.


Spring 2007

Spring 2008

Spring 2009

HS essay

mean

HS essay

mean

HS essay

mean

Berea

15.7

BEREA

26.73

Berea

23.33

CCA

42

CCA PNI

39.25

CCA

45.3

CHS

9.97

CHS

17.04

CHS

15.32

CSDA

20.8

CSDA

28.38

CSDA

32.19

Faichuk

4.95

FHS

6.18

Faichuk

5.57

KHS

26.91

KHS

25.99

KHS non-a

25.24

KHS adv

37.27

KHS a1

40.71

KHS advanced

32.71

KHS a2

38.31

KHS a2

29.23

KHS academic

26.76

Mizpah

21.05

MCHS

20.1

Mizpah

22.91

Mado HS

26.36

MHS

24.59

MHS

20.62

Mortlocks



9.77



NICHS

19.58

NICHS

13.98



NMS

27.75

NMHS

22.58

NMHS

25.07

NMS a

36.74

NMHS a1

30.95

NMHS a1

27.48



NMHS a2

22.43

NMHS a2

33.25

NMS b

23.74

NMHS b

20.2

NMHS b

21.23

NMS v1

19



NMHS v1

25.2

NMS v2

20.91

NMHS v

18.81

NMHS v2

19.61



NMHS h

18.85



Nukuno

12.91





Ohwa

23.33

OCHS

16.17

Ohwa

26

OIHS

21.3

OIHS

18.87

OIHS

18.15



OLMVTS

33.56

OLMS

27.33

PICS all

25.16

PICS all

28.73

PICS all

27.44

PICS a1

34.48



PICS a1

36.13





PICS a2

29.69





PICS a3

31.33





PICS a4

28.23





PICS a5

28.87





PICS a6

24.54

PICS aca

28.68





PICS bus

26.91



PICS bus

25.57

PICS voc

19.26



PICS voc

20.74

PLHA

14.69

PLHA

18.67

PLHA

17.42

PSDA

37.22

SDA PNI

41

PSDA

38.63

Saramen

28.69

SARAM

37

Saramen

22.7

YSDA

40.44

SDA (YAP)

30

YSDA

28.2

SNHS

14.05

SNHS

8.02

SNHSF

8.61



SNHS-F

9.18

SNHST

10.18

Weipat



5.59



Weno

14.81

WHS

17.65

Weno

14.57

Xavier

40.27

XHS

43.63

Xavier

44.65

YHS

23.86

YHS

28.99

YHS

29.33

Overall

22.03

Overall

24.35

Overall

23.21


Although year-to-year variation in the mean for schools is not known, changes of five or more may prove significant provided the sample size is thirty or more students. For smaller sample sizes, changes of ten or more would likely be statistically significant.


Special note: Was the essay more difficult this year than last year?


A comparison year-on-year returned the following statistics:

Statistic

Essay Sp 08

Essay Sp 09

Sample size

1815

1713

Stdev

12.92

11.99

lower bnd

23.27

22.65

upper bnd

24.46

23.78

mean

23.87

23.21

difference


-0.66

p-value


0.12


The average fell a statistically insignificant -0.66 points, p-value of 0.12. Significance would not be imputed until the p-value fell below 0.05. Statistically there was no significant difference in performance year-on-year.

A visual chart of the 95% confidence intervals for the past three terms:





A statistical tie 2008 to 2009.. What about the frequency distributions, any sign of a difference visually that would indicate an increase in difficulty?


Illustration 2: Distribution of scores on the essay subtest of the COMET



One difference can be clearly seen: far fewer zeros due to the change in the way off-topic essays were scored . Otherwise the two frequency distributions are not all that dissimilar. The differences do not appear to be statistically significant.

The essay continues to perform in a statistically predictable manner with a reasonable distribution around a single central peak. The wobbliness appears to either be a byproduct of having two graders or simply natural random variation.

Were the essays too difficult this term? A final anecdotal single data point. An eight year old third grader who is an L1 English speaker was approached and asked to write an essay based on one of the topic questions. A grader was approached and the essay was marked as an 18. Doubled (two graders) that is theoretically a 36, which would put the third grader at fourth rank among the high school averages.


The essay was not too difficult, the vast bulk of the high school seniors in this nation cannot write a college level essay. Later in this report the grade level equivalents for vocabulary and comprehension will provide further insight into the weaknesses of the candidates.

Mathematics section: Mean Mathematics Scores by High School


The mean score by high school for the mathematics section represents the average number correct out of forty for a high school.


A student blindly guessing on all forty questions, each with five multiple choice options, should get at least eight correct. Given that the first few problems involve basic arithmetic, scores around twelve or under are extremely weak performances.


Illustration three on the next page depicts the 95% confidence interval for the mean mathematics scores, with the high schools in descending mathematics score order. The vertical bars are the extent of the 95% confidence interval for the sample mean. Where a vertical line for one school overlaps the mean (the center line) of a another school, the first school is not statistically significantly separated from the second school's mean.







In 2008 the Kosrae High School advanced section topped the rank order for the public school students. This section repeated this strong performance in spring 2009.


In 2008 the academic section at Nanpei Memorial High school was the second ranked public school section. Spring 2009 Nanpei Memorial High School, all sections combined, achieved second rank, and number one for a high school as a whole. Statistically and mathematically this is a phenomenal achievement. Nanpei Memorial High School, all sections combined, is statistically achieving on par with students from top private schools, outscoring a number of these schools.


Nanpei Memorial section A1 are students with last names in the first half of the alphabet, A2 are those in the second half, with adjustment of the boundary to create equal sections size. Nanpei Memorial's A2 section rank ordered placed third in the nation. This is a phenomenal success. Anecdotally, credit is apparently being given to a physicist from England who led the senior year math classes 2008-2009. This suggests that in the secondary schools, the key is content not methods per se. While the physicist apparently did need and accept some guidance from veteran instructors at Nanpei, the physicist was able to lift all of the students at NMHS to strong performances, relatively speaking.


Of note on the chart above are the strong performances by the academic sections at Kosrae High School and Nanpei Memorial High School.


At under 12 were both Southern Noumeneas High School at Fefan and Faichuuk High School. These performances are so close to random that one could effectively argue there would be no significant impact from the cessation of the teaching of mathematics. Shift the resources into language acquisition skills. Both of these high schools were also below 12 on the spring 2008 run of the test. No improvement, no change, and Faichuuk is statistically indistinguishable from random spring 2009.



Diversity


The differences in the performances by state have repercussions on the make-up of the regular admissions. The table below compares the composition of the regular admissions to the state shares of the national population. The table reflects the state of the high school, not the cultural identity of the individual test takers.



State

Chuuk

Kosrae

Pohnpei

Yap

Totals

2006

Assoc

75

55

225

67

422


RF

18%

13%

53%

16%

100%

2007

Assoc

59

63

221

57

400


RF

15%

16%

55%

14%

100%

2008

Assoc

93

47

201

63

404


RF

23%

12%

50%

16%

100%

2009

Assoc

69

49

212

80

410


RF

17%

12%

52%

20%

100%


Pop 2000

53595

7686

34486

11241

107008


Pop RF

50%

7%

32%

11%

100%

Factors

2006

0.35

1.81

1.65

1.51



2007

0.29

2.19

1.71

1.36



2008

0.46

1.62

1.54

1.48



2009

0.34

1.71

1.62

1.77



A factor equal to one means that students from that state were admitted to associates degree programs at a proportion equal to their share of the national population. A factor of 2.0 would mean that students from that state were admitted to associates degree programs at twice their share of the national population. A factor of 0.5 would mean that students from that state are underrepresented with only a 50% share of the associates admissions relative to their share of the national population. Factors far from one are not necessarily "good" for long term national stability and unity in terms of educational opportunities.


Students from high schools in Yap are the most over-represented group in the regular admissions category with 1.77 times their share of the national population, up from 1.48 the previous year. For the past three years Kosrae has been the most overrepresented subpopulation.


Those from high schools in Chuuk are under-represented at a factor of 0.34 of their share of the national population, a drop from 0.46 the year before. While the table is based on the location of the high school and not the actual cultural identity of the students, the data is still likely roughly reflective of the underlying cultural diversity of those who took the entrance test.


Note that as one state gains an increasing share of the 400 associate degrees slots, other states lose share. As noted earlier, this is a zero-sum game.


The complication in terms of actual diversity of the freshmen class at the national site is that the differential rates of matriculation into the college are not known. Anecdotally there is the suggestion that Pohnpeians are more likely to take up the offer to attend an associate degree program at Palikir than students in the other states. This may further skew the diversity away from the national share of the population.



Illustration 3: Factors displayed graphically 2006 to 2009



Grade Level Equivalents


The vocabulary and comprehension tests permitted the calculation of grade level equivalents


Test

Non-Admit

Certificate

Associates

Overall

Vocabulary

3.3

4.4

6.7

4.7

Comprehension

5.6

7.3

11.5

7.9

Table 4: Mean grade level equivalent by admission status


Candidates accepted into associates degree programs have a vocabulary grade level equivalent of seventh grade with a comprehension grade level equivalent of nearly eleventh grade. The certificate program instructors can expect students with a fourth grade equivalent vocabulary level and a seventh grade equivalent comprehension. These grade levels are unchanged from the spring 2008 grade levels. The grade level equivalents appear to be stable across time.


The non-admitted students are properly non-admitted unless the college wants to start admitting third grade level equivalent students in terms of vocabulary.


The following table provides the vocabulary grade level equivalent for the high schools in descending rank order. Pilot studies have indicated that the college students are weaker in vocabulary than in comprehension. The argument made is that a student can "bridge" across misunderstood vocabulary from context, hence one's comprehension can exceed one's vocabulary.


School

Vocabulary Grade Equivalent

Comprehension Grade Equivalent

CCA

11.7

12.7

Xavier

9.5

12.8

KHS a

8.2

12.5

YSDA

7

12.6

PSDA

7

11

Private schools

5.8

9.7

KHS a2

5.5

9.7

Kosrae state

5.8

9.3

KHS

5.8

9.3

CSDA

5.5

9.3

YHS

5.5

9.1

Ohwa

5.2

9.1

Yap state

5.2

8.6

Saramen

4.9

8.6

KHS non-admit

5.2

8.2

NMHS

4.7

8.6

PICS

4.9

8.2

Pohnpei state

4.9

8.2

Total Result

4.7

7.9

Public schools

4.7

7.8

Berea

4.4

7.8

PLHA

4.2

7.8

MHS

4.2

7.8

OIHS

4.2

7

Chuuk state

4.2

7

OLMS

3.6

7

Mizpah

3.3

7

CHS

3.9

6.4

Weno

3.9

6.2

SNHSF

3.6

5.9

SNHST

3.6

5.9

Faichuuk

3.3

5.4


Of interest is the strong performance by the advanced (a) and academic (a2) sections at Kosrae High School. The KHS advanced students outscored the next non-Kosrae public high school by three grade levels on comprehension. Note that on this chart KHS as a whole and YHS reverse their rank order from the essay.


The strong performance by the private schools as a group is partly a result of these schools having a larger percentage of students who are likely to have either grown up with English in their home or environment. Private schools such as Pohnpei SDA use English starting in preschool, and some students are from families where one or both parents are L1 speakers of English.


In the public schools, the vast majority of the students are L2 English. The balance that must be kept is ensuring that L1 local language skills not be neglected in the push to acquire English. L2 English skills can be improved in parallel with L1 local language learning. All high schools should have L1 local language programs.


The public high schools in Chuuk have used twelve years to produce 3.66 years worth of vocabulary learning. The statewide average of a 4.2 grade equivalent vocabulary is being boosted by the presence of Xavier and Saramen in Chuuk. Comprehension grade level equivalents are grade 5.96, barely sixth grade. Ultimately no nation can move forward and develop by leaving half of its citizens behind educationally.


Author and contact information:


All errors are solely those of the author. Please contact Dana Lee Ling at dleeling@comfsm.fm or 691-320-2480 extension 228 if you have questions, corrections, or unmet data needs in regards the COMET test.

Appendix A. Essay mean statistics including upper and lower bounds for the 95% confidence interval for the mean based on the inverse t-distribution.


School

n

lower

upper

mean

stdev

CCA

10

41.75

48.85

45.3

4.97

Xavier

31

43.03

46.26

44.65

4.4

Pohnpei UB

26

35.95

42.2

39.08

7.73

PSDA

40

35.6

41.65

38.63

9.46

PICS a1

32

33.45

38.8

36.13

7.43

NMHS a2

20

28.71

37.79

33.25

9.71

KHS a

24

29.71

35.7

32.71

7.09

CSDA

26

28.19

36.19

32.19

9.9

PICS a3

30

28.14

34.53

31.33

8.56

PICS a2

32

25.78

33.6

29.69

10.85

YHS

141

27.79

30.87

29.33

9.25

PICS a5

31

25.66

32.08

28.87

8.74

PICS a4

30

25.24

31.23

28.23

8.03

YSDA

5

17.87

38.53

28.2

8.32

NMHS a1

21

23.37

31.59

27.48

9.03

PICS

317

26.38

28.51

27.44

9.6

OLMS

6

24.47

30.2

27.33

2.73

KHS

107

25.47

28.96

27.21

9.13

KHS a2

21

22.76

30.77

26.76

8.8

Ohwa

9

21.06

30.94

26

6.42

PICS b

82

23.68

27.47

25.57

8.64

KHS non-a

62

22.91

27.58

25.24

9.2

NMHS v1

20

20.8

29.6

25.2

9.4

NMHS

106

23.1

27.04

25.07

10.23

YSC

69

22.83

27.11

24.97

8.91

PICS a6

24

20.77

28.32

24.54

8.94

Berea

24

16.5

30.17

23.33

16.19

KSC

4

19.72

26.78

23.25

2.22

Overall

1713

22.65

23.78

23.21

11.99

Mizpah

22

19.88

25.94

22.91

6.84

Saramen

44

19.44

25.97

22.7

10.74

PSC

190

20.67

23.56

22.11

10.1

NMHS b

13

15.39

27.07

21.23

9.67

PICS v

31

17.22

24.26

20.74

9.6

MHS

90

18.49

22.76

20.62

10.2

NMHS v2

31

16.48

22.74

19.61

8.54

OIHS

34

15.68

20.62

18.15

7.08

PLHA

26

14.22

20.63

17.42

7.94

CSC

102

15.15

18.37

16.76

8.2

CHS

127

13.32

17.33

15.32

11.41

Weno

70

12.09

17.05

14.57

10.4

SNHST

34

7.56

12.8

10.18

7.51

SNHSF

44

5.48

11.75

8.61

10.3

Faichuk

35

3.27

7.88

5.57

6.71


Appendix B. Mean math sum statistics including upper and lower bounds for the 95% confidence interval for the mean math sum based on the inverse t-distribution.


School

n

lower

upper

mean

stdev

Pohnpei UB

26

30.89

34.26

32.58

4.17

KHS a

24

30.67

34.33

32.5

4.34

NMHS a2

20

28.79

32.81

30.8

4.29

PICS a1

32

28.65

32.41

30.53

5.22

NMHS a1

21

28.38

32.2

30.29

4.2

CCA

10

26.25

32.55

29.4

4.4

Xavier

31

24.2

32.57

28.39

11.41

NMHS b

13

23.25

29.98

26.62

5.56

NMHS

106

24.18

28.12

26.15

10.23

PICS a2

32

24.3

27.51

25.91

4.46

KHS a2

21

22.79

26.83

24.81

4.43

YSDA

5

16.26

32.94

24.6

6.71

PSDA

40

20.39

26.86

23.63

10.1

PICS a3

30

22.01

25.05

23.53

4.07

NMHS v2

31

20.91

24.76

22.84

5.25

OLMS

6

20.34

24.99

22.67

2.22

NMHS v1

20

18.8

25.7

22.25

7.36

KHS

83

19.81

23.44

21.63

8.32

MHS

90

19.63

23.46

21.54

9.13

KSC

4

16.9

25.6

21.25

2.73

PICS

317

19.43

22.08

20.76

11.99

KHS non-a

62

19.36

21.74

20.55

4.68

PICS a4

30

18.96

21.78

20.37

3.77

PSC

190

18.82

21.9

20.36

10.74

PLHA

26

17.01

22.53

19.77

6.84

YSC

69

17.95

21.56

19.75

7.51

PICS a5

31

17.91

21.57

19.74

4.99

YHS

146

17.98

21.39

19.68

10.4

Ohwa

9

12.6

26.29

19.44

8.91

Total Result

1721

18.81

19.48

19.14

7.07

PICS b

82

17.93

19.75

18.84

4.16

Saramen

44

14.85

21.06

17.95

10.2

PICS a6

24

15.42

19.49

17.46

4.82

OIHS

34

10.5

21.8

16.15

16.19

Mizpah

22

12.97

18.67

15.82

6.42

Berea

24

13.61

17.81

15.71

4.97

CSDA

26

11.66

19.65

15.65

9.9

PICS v

31

13.71

16.36

15.03

3.61

CSC

102

12.69

15.47

14.08

7.09

CHS

128

11.9

15.21

13.55

9.46

SNHST

35

10.53

15.98

13.26

7.94

Weno

70

11.07

14.98

13.03

8.2

SNHSF

44

8.96

13.27

11.11

7.08

Faichuk

35

5.17

11.52

8.34

9.25



Appendix C.


COMET Sub-Test 3 (Writing) Analytic Scale [Essay rubric]


Syntax

5

Grammar and word order nearly perfect.

4

Some errors of grammar or word order but communication not impaired.

3

Errors of grammar or word order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading necessary for full comprehension.

2

Errors of grammar or word order frequent; efforts of interpretation sometimes required on reader’s part.

1

Errors of grammar or word order very frequent; reader often has to rely on own interpretation.

0

Errors of grammar or word order so severe as to make comprehension virtually impossible.


Vocabulary

5

Wide and correctly used vocabulary.

4

Occasionally uses inappropriate terms or relies on circumlocution; expression of ideas not impaired.

3

Uses wrong or inappropriate words fairly frequently; expression of ideas may be limited because of inadequate vocabulary.

2

Limited vocabulary and frequent errors clearly hinder expression of ideas.

1

Vocabulary so limited and so frequently misused that reader must often rely on own interpretation.

0

Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension virtually impossible.


Organization

5

Extremely well organized.

4

Material fairly well organized; links could occasionally be clearer but communication not impaired.

3

Some lack of organization; re-reading required for clarification of ideas.

2

Little or no attempt at connectivity, though reader can deduce some organization.

1

Individual ideas may be clear, but very difficult to deduce connection between them.

0

Lack of organization so severe that communication is seriously impaired.


Cohesion

5

Strong cohesion with smooth transitions both within and between paragraphs.

4

Occasional lack of consistency in choice of cohesive structures and vocabulary but overall ease of communication not impaired.

3

Patchy’, with some cohesive structures or vocabulary items noticeably inappropriate to general style.

2

Cohesive structures or vocabulary items sometimes not only inappropriate but also misused; little sense of ease of communication.

1

Communication often impaired by completely inappropriate or misused cohesive structures or vocabulary items.

0

A ‘hotchpotch’ of half-learned misused cohesive structures and vocabulary items rendering communication almost impossible.


Content

5

Full and complete answer, inclusive of all parts of the task.

4

Relevant and adequate answer to the task set.

3

For the most part answers the task set, though there may be some gaps or redundant information.

2

Answer of limited relevance to the task set. Possibly major gaps in treatment of topic and/or pointless repetition.

1

Answer bears little relation to the task set.

0

No evidence of assigned task. (If it is obvious that the student wrote on an unrelated topic give a zero for the content but mark the essay for syntax, vocabulary, cohesion, and organization. If there is found to be evidence that the essay is a "canned" or "memorized" essay, then the essay receives a zero on all metrics.)


04/09/06 04:06:57 PM Page 8 of 31