| Answer | Units | Points | Marked | trial four | ||
| Variable | kg | 2 | ans + unit | 1. What is your mass in kilograms? | time/s | distance/m | 
| Variable | m | 2 | ans + unit | 2. What is your height in meters? | 0.00 | 0.00 | 
| Variable | kg/m² | 2 | calc + unit | 3. Find BMI | 0.88 | 10.00 | 
| 230 | Cm³ | 3 | calc + unit + sigdigs | 4. Volume for 9.6 cm long by 3.9 cm thick by 6.1 cm | 1.49 | 15.00 | 
| Speed or velocity | 1 | 5. What is the physical meaning of the slope | 1.95 | 20.00 | ||
| 86.8 | m/s | 3 | calc + unit + sigdigs | 6. predict the distance the ball would roll after ten seconds. | 3.65 | 25.00 | 
| 1.01 | s | 3 | calc + unit + sigdigs | 7. A ball falls 500 cm. Given that gravity = 980 cm/s², how long | 5.10 | 30.00 | 
| Variable | 1 | dependent on 9 | 8. Will the ball obey your predictions above? | |||
| Variable | 1 | 9. Why, or why not, will the ball above obey your prediction? | slope | 5.47 | ||
| For use in war... | 1 | military applications | 10.Why was the shape formed by a ball arcing through the air | intercept | 4.75 | |
| parabola | 1 | parabola | 11. What is the name of the shape of the curve | |||
| Notes: | ||||||
| #3: The intent was to see if you could use esisting data to obtain a derived result for a new formula, a common occurrence in science | ||||||
| #6: Fifteen seconds is ambiguous as to the number of significant digits. 87 m/s would also be a fine answer. | ||||||
| #7: will not be less than one: 2*500/980 = 1000/980 > 1. Square root results do not "cross" one. If your result was less than one | ||||||
| then you "inverted" something. If your answer was 1.02 then you forgot to take the square root. | ||||||
| #8: Confused some students. Some chose to focus on #6 where repeating a ball speed seems difficult while others focused on #7 | ||||||
| where repeating a drop is straightforward and easily done. Bear in mind that if we could design a machine to fire the tennis balls, | ||||||
| then we really could repeat a throw speed. Then the tennis ball would be far more predictable, no? | ||||||
| Maybe a motor spinning a couple tricycle wheels... | ||||||
| #9 Uncertainty does not mean unpredictability. You will always be uncertain of the exact amount of time each trip to the college will take, | ||||||
| but you are usually certain that you will get there eventually. Amid uncertainty, predictability. This is another truism in science. So do not | ||||||
| take uncertainty to mean unpredictability. It just limits our ability to make an exact prediction. If data forms lines or curves on graphs, | ||||||
| then there is a pattern. And if there a pattern, then predictions can be made. Patterns mean that there a mathematical relationship | ||||||
| underneath the system, a math relationship that can provide predictions. And, as always, some uncertainty in that prediction. | ||||||
| And, again, in #6, just because we cannot throw a ball twice at the same speed is not a reason to dispute predictability: that is a human | ||||||
| limitation. If we could throw it identically, then we would expect similar time and distance numbers. Witness the ball drop from 500 cm: | ||||||
| 1.02, 1.03, 1.04, 1.05, 1.05, 1.18 seconds. And doesn't that last number look suspicious? Yes – because we expect predictability. | ||||||