With the admission function approved, the following is the high school break down, or as I think of it, the list that is misused.  So that we are clear on this, the key statistical features to look at are how many students placed into college level math classes or produced a five or six on the essay.  I will requote that data at the end of this email, because those are the hard statistics that really measure student learning.  This chart shows both the number of students and percentage admitted to where by high school.  SC is state campus, IEP is the Intensive English Program, N is the National campus.
 
HS SC IEP N Sums SC IEP N Avg
Xavier

26 26 0 0 1 3
CCA

9 9 0 0 1 3
PPSD
1 22 23 0 0.04 0.96 2.96
PSDA
1 21 22 0 0.05 0.95 2.95
PATS 1 3 20 24 0.04 0.13 0.83 2.79
PICS 19 40 266 325 0.06 0.12 0.82 2.76
SCA 3 6 33 42 0.07 0.14 0.79 2.71
OIHS 3 4 21 28 0.11 0.14 0.75 2.64
KHS 10 27 89 126 0.08 0.21 0.71 2.63
YHS 16 20 67 103 0.16 0.19 0.65 2.5
CSDA 3 1 9 13 0.23 0.08 0.69 2.46
KSC 2 1 6 9 0.22 0.11 0.67 2.44
Mizpah 3 8 11 22 0.14 0.36 0.5 2.36
Ohwa 2 3 5 10 0.2 0.3 0.5 2.3
NICHS 7 8 14 29 0.24 0.28 0.48 2.24
YSDA 2
3 5 0.4 0 0.6 2.2
Berea 10 5 9 24 0.42 0.21 0.38 1.96
PLHA 19 12 7 38 0.5 0.32 0.18 1.68
CHS 178 50 40 268 0.66 0.19 0.15 1.49
SNHS 66 16 7 89 0.74 0.18 0.08 1.34
Weno 87 18 8 113 0.77 0.16 0.07 1.3
NCHS 9 1 1 11 0.82 0.09 0.09 1.27
Sums: 440 225 694 1359 0.32 0.17 0.51 2.19
 
The function approved in admissions board today that produced the above table is:

=IF(OR(AND(OR(AND(Structure>=22;Reading>=27);Sum Of Structure + Reading>=49);Composition (or projected composition)>1);AND(Stucture>=16;Reading>=20;Composition (or projected Composition)>5));3;IF(AND(Structure>=16;Readng>=20;Composition>0);2;1))

Where:
Structure = 22 corresponds to a TOEFL structure score of 469.38
Structure = 16 corresponds to a TOEFL structure score of 399.93
Reading= 27 corresponds to a TOEFL reading score of 466.27
Reading= 20 corresponds to a TOEFL reading score of 402.22
Sum of structure + reading = 49 is equivalent to a 470 average of the reading and structure score using the function:

=10*((1.158*Structure+21.47)+(0.915*Reading+21.92))/2

Yields:
Projected destination (ProjDest) 3: National Campus: 694
2: IEP: 225
1: State Campus: 440
 
I used a projected composition (projcomp) scores for PICS using:

=ROUND(0.1258*Average of structure and reading-0.1929;0)

because the average had the highest correlation to the composition score of r = 0.7434.

The following is the chart that I think does a better job of capturing a high school's capacity to produce literate students.   The first column is the high school. The first row is the essay score.  The numbers and percentages are displayed below.  The table is in descending order by average.  Bear in mind that next year the cut-off will lift from a minimum of two to a minimum of three.  Any high school with an average below three should consider itself to be in need of a reinvigorated effort to teach English.
HS 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sum 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg
Xavier



5 21 26 0% 0% 0% 0% 19% 81% 5.81
CCA

3 3
3 9 0% 0% 33% 33% 0% 33% 4.33
PSDA

7 5 9 1 22 0% 0% 32% 23% 41% 5% 4.18
SCA

8 22 11 1 42 0% 0% 19% 52% 26% 2% 4.12
KHS 1 8 43 43 25 6 126 1% 6% 34% 34% 20% 5% 3.80
Pni Police

8 12 3
23 0% 0% 35% 52% 13% 0% 3.78
PICS 1 18 113 144 40 9 325 0% 6% 35% 44% 12% 3% 3.71
CSDA
2 4 3 4
13 0% 15% 31% 23% 31% 0% 3.69
YHS 4 14 36 18 25 6 103 4% 14% 35% 17% 24% 6% 3.62
OIHS
3 9 13 3
28 0% 11% 32% 46% 11% 0% 3.57
PATS 1 3 8 7 4 1 24 4% 13% 33% 29% 17% 4% 3.54
YSDA

3 2

5 0% 0% 60% 40% 0% 0% 3.40
KSC
3 4 2

9 0% 33% 44% 22% 0% 0% 2.89
Berea 2 5 14 3

24 8% 21% 58% 13% 0% 0% 2.75
Ohwa 1 4 3 1 1
10 10% 40% 30% 10% 10% 0% 2.70
NICHS 3 12 10 4

29 10% 41% 34% 14% 0% 0% 2.52
Mizpah 3 11 7
1
22 14% 50% 32% 0% 5% 0% 2.32
SNHS 33 24 25 7

89 37% 27% 28% 8% 0% 0% 2.07
PLHA 8 22 6 2

38 21% 58% 16% 5% 0% 0% 2.05
CHS 125 85 34 17 4 1 268 47% 32% 13% 6% 1% 0% 1.83
Weno 56 30 17 10

113 50% 27% 15% 9% 0% 0% 1.83
NCHS 5 5
1

11 45% 45% 0% 9% 0% 0% 1.73
Sum: 243 249 362 319 135 49 1359 18% 18% 27% 23% 10% 4% 3.00
 
On the essay the following rubric was applied:
1 Incompetent
2 Possibly incompetent
3 Developing competence
4 Minimally competent
5 Competent
6 Clearly competent
 
Requoting refreshed math data, sorted as before by the second column from the right.  This choice is because the from our perspective the "best" school is the school that places the most students into college level courses. 
High School 90 95 98 100 101 p10x Avg
Xavier 23% 8% 35% 27% 8% 35% 96.69
CCA 56% 11% 0% 33% 0% 33% 93.89
PSDA 50% 0% 23% 27% 0% 27% 94.55
Ohwa 80% 0% 0% 20% 0% 20% 92
PATS 42% 8% 33% 17% 0% 17% 94.75
PICS 53% 11% 21% 14% 1% 15.4% 93.74
KHS 66% 11% 8% 13% 2% 15.1% 92.71
PPSD 83% 9% 0% 9% 0% 9% 91.3
SCA 79% 7% 7% 7% 0% 7% 91.64
YHS 81% 5% 9% 4% 2% 6% 91.54
CHS 97% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% 90.17
Weno 96% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 90.25
PLHA 95% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 90.26
Mizpah 95% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 90.23
KSC 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 90
NCHS 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 90
CSDA 92% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 90.62
OIHS 86% 11% 4% 0% 0% 0% 90.82
YSDA 80% 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 91
NICHS 97% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 90.28
SNHS 94% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 90.31
Berea 96% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 90.33








Overall 77% 6% 9% 7% 1% 8% 91.79